|
January 28 Update |
|
|
During legislative
sessions legislators can be called at: (505) 986-4300, written to at: [The "Hotlines Link" will take you to our daily hotline archive. You may view previous hotlines to place current events in perspective.] Which Side Are You On? The old union song asks
the question, "which side are you on." We need to remind Senators,
especially members of the
Senate
Public Affairs Committee to be on the side of school and other public
employees as negotiations over a final version of Senate
Bill 46, the Public Employee Collective Bargaining Act was go down to
the wire. The
legislation is sponsored by Senate President
pro temp Richard Romero and co-sponsored by Democratic
Floor Leader Manny Aragon. Senator
Romero has asked labor and management lobbyists to try to reach
consensus on some divisive issues. This approach is alright for the
moment, however, Senator
Romero and all other Senators
need to be reminded to support school employees on the important issues of: Governor Richardson has created a work team with NEA-NM membership to work on differences in his budget proposals and education reform. The team meets for the first time on January 29. Publicly, he continues his demand that school districts use 5% of administration for direct instruction, especially teacher salaries. However, his office is discussing the ramifications with various education groups, including NEA-NM. He called for moving to the average regional teacher salary next year with a 6% teacher salary increase. As we move into the 2003 legislative session, we applaud Governor Richardson for making teacher salaries a priority. We applaud his initiative to force a critical look at school district cash balances. However, we need to emphasize to the governor and legislators that we need equitable salaries for all education employees. We
are mindful that there are three other budget proposals: the state board of
education's (SBE), the Legislative Finance Committee's (LFC), and the
Legislative Education Study Committee's (LESC). Each
of the four budget proposals has strengths and drawbacks. The LESC
proposes funding the three-tiered teacher licensing program proposed in the
reform bill of 2001 and giving all employees a five per cent salary
increase, raising school funding some 168 million dollars. The LFC
proposes funding the first year of the new licensure system, providing a
2.5% raise for teachers and a 2% raise for other employees, and about 60
million new dollars. The SBE proposes a 5.5% salary increase for all
employees and about a 198 million dollar increase. The governor
proposes redirecting some current dollars, a 6% salary increase for
teachers, the use of cash balances to find money for other employee raises
and about 40 million new dollars. Also
the LESC's ad hoc Task Force is proposing reform legislation similar
to that vetoed by Gary Johnson in 2001. This legislation would set
minimum salary levels for teachers based on their level of New Mexico
teaching license. Level I minimums would immediately rise to $30,000
this year with a 2.5% increase in teacher salary schedules for a total cost
of a 28.25 million dollars. Level two minimums would become $40,000
and level III minimums would become $50,000 in steps over the next five
years. We
believe that the give and take of a legislative session will eventually
produce a budget for the state and public schools. We will advocate
for all of our legislative priorities as this process unfolds. Those
priorities include equitable salaries for all education employees and the
right of all employees to bargain collectively with their employers.
Now is not the time to attack any of the budget
proposals! We must await details of all of them and then use the
legislative process to produce the best compromise. Our message to legislators should be: The Governor has made schools a priority. We need to go further and add additional revenues to school funding to provide equitable salaries for all employees. We need to use this legislative session to explore addition long-term revenue streams for public schools. Some revenue suggestions: A constitutional amendment on the ballot for a special election to
increase distributions form the Land Grant Permanent Fund from 4.7% of the
fund per year to 5.5% of the fund per year (about 50 million new dollars
dedicated to public schools) Don't forget these
this important event:
|
||