|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links to:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, February 14 Legislative Hotline Conference Committee Restores Salaries to 5% Average A conference committee of the House and Senate completed its work late yesterday on the General Appropriations Act. Late last night, the Senate approved the plan on a voice vote and it is expected to be approved by the House this morning. The plan increases school funding overall by some $5.4 million and the school equalization guarantee by $5.2 million. The compromise raises school employee salaries to an average 5%, including the advancement of level three teachers to next years $45,000 minimum, which increases the average for teachers to about 5.5%. The language also includes an average 9.5% increase for educational assistants. The language requiring an average, rather than across the board increases, is important to make sure that career employees who may not have received significant increases as three-tiered licensure was implemented can be treated fairly. This language makes collective bargain even more important as a process to insure that school employees can be a part of the decision-making on salary schedules. The actual language follows:
While this measure is not all we wanted, your great effort helped convince legislators to restore the salary cut made by the Senate. The measure will soon be on the governor's desk and we will be assessing our recommendations to him. The committee members were Senator Ben Altamirano, Senator John Arthur Smith, Senator Leonard Lee Rawson, Representative Kiki Saavedra, Representative Lucky Varela, and Representative Jeannette Wallace.
Educational Assistant Career Ladder Bill Waiting in Finance Committees House Bill 206-Educational Assistant Career Ladder, introduced by Representative Rick Miera, provides an EA career ladder and minimum salaries: Level 1 $12,000; Level 2 $13,000; Level 3 $15,000; Level 4 $17,000. The House Education Committee gave a do-pass recommendation to the measure. The bill is temporarily tabled in the House Appropriations and Finance Committee. That tabling is part of a strategy to keep the measure alive in case the 9.5% salary increase provided Educational Assistants in the General Appropriations Act does not survive in the final budget. The Senate version of the bill, Senator Mary Kay Papen's Senate Bill 232 received a do-pass recommendation from the Senate Education Committee. It is awaiting a hearing in the Senate Finance Committee.
Click on this link to ask legislators to support the Educational Assistant Career Ladder legislation
One Minimum Wage Bill Clears House-One, Badly Mangled, is on Senate Calendar House Bill 258, sponsored by Speaker Ben Lujan, passed the House Monday on a near party-line vote of 38-30. With 10 days left in the annual legislative session, the measure headed to the state Senate, where an alternative proposal — $7.50 phased in over three years — is pending. The House bill would increase the state's current $5.15 minimum — same as the federal minimum — to $6.75 in 2007 and to $7.50 in 2008. Employers could pay a "training wage'' of $5.15 for the first 60 days a worker was on the job. And, in a concession to chile producers, food processors could apply to the state Department of Labor for exemptions. The bill passed the House on a vote of 38-30 after three hours of debate. Democrats went along with a Republican amendment that would bring state and local governments under the minimum wage law. Currently, they're exempt. Supporters said there would be minimal budget impact on state government. The bill provides a cost of living increase of the annual Cost of Living Index or 3% whichever is less, and protects Santa Fe's already higher living wage ordinance. This important fairness measure received a do-pass recommendation from the Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee and is now awaiting a hearing in the Senate Finance Committee. Let Senators know that raising the state's minimum wage is an important fairness issue for all the state's workers. Senate Bill 449, sponsored by Senate President Pro Tem Ben Altamirano, would have raised the wage to $6.50 an hour in January 2007, to $7 in 2008 and to $7.50 in 2009.The Senate Finance Committee amended the bill to increase the state's minimum wage to $6 an hour Jan. 1. An employee who remained with an employer for a year would have to earn a minimum of $6.75 an hour. Once the employee stayed two years, he or she would have to earn at least $7.50. The new, amended measure also would prohibit Santa Fe's wage from going higher than $9.50 an hour and would permanently prevent local governments from raising their own minimum wages higher than the state level. Altamirano's original bill would have left Santa Fe's living wage ordinance alone and would have prevented local wage increases for five years. The amended bill also exempts food processors from having to pay the minimum wage. Ask Senators to remove this crippling amendment on the Senate floor and pass the bill in its original form. Trio of Bad Bills Still Alive-Act Now to Ask Legislators to Kill these Bills: Bill to Give Private Schools Tax Money for Technology May Be in Committee Monday
Senate Bill 743 was rescheduled for a hearing Saturday morning
in the
Senate Education Committee,
but was not heard when the sponsor failed to show .
This anti-public school measure will probably show up on the committee
agenda on Tuesday.
This bill adds a new section to the Technology for Education Act to allow
accredited private schools to receive distribution from the Educational
Technology Fund. Even though well intended, the measure would allow
public money to be spent, in an unconstitutional manner, for private and
religious schools.
The bill requires the Public Education Department to
annually fix a means of distributing state Educational Technology Fund
monies to private schools, thus reducing the $16 per student currently
distributed to public schools. Such a distribution of funds to a private
school is a violation of Article IV, Section 31 of the New Mexico
Constitution, which prohibits a direct educational appropriation to any
person, corporation, association, institution or community not under the
direct control of the state and is also in violation of the anti-donation
provisions in the constitution. Additionally, the measure also violates
Article XII, Section 3 of the New Mexico Constitution because it
prohibits the use of public money for the support "of any sectarian,
denominational or private school…" Click this Link to Ask members of the Committee to Oppose Senate Bill 743.
Bill to Cut Retirement Benefits for New Employees in Senate Finance Senate Bill 206, sponsored by Senator John Arthur Smith, would make it harder for new employees to retire. Currently employees are eligible to retire after 25 years of service or when their years of service and age equal 75, the so-called Rule of 75. This bill proposes a Rule of 80 as the requirement new employees who choose this retirement option. This bill is awaiting a hearing in the Senate Finance Committee and remains on the committee schedule. Since Senator John Arthur Smith is the powerful vice-chair of this committee, this measure is almost assuredly headed to the Senate Floor. Let Senators know that is not fair to create a retirement system for new employees inferior to that afforded current employees and it is not fair further increase the disparity between educational retirement and that of other public employees! We oppose any change that increases the disparity between ERA and PERA members or any change that makes new employees second class citizens with inferior benefits to current employees. Follow this link to Send an Email to Ask Your Senator to Oppose Senate Bill 206. Tuition Tax Credit Bill Also on Way to Senate Finance
Senate Bill 238, also sponsored by Senator John
Arthur Smith is a voucher in disguise. This terrible measure
would cost the treasury of New Mexico at least $10,000,000 and allow this
money to flow directly into private and religious schools. The
measure would provide a $500 tax credit to anyone who makes a donation to
an organization that provides private school scholarships!
A credit against income tax is considered a tax expenditure in that, while
it is not a direct payment from the state to the taxpayer, the taxpayer
reduces the amount of tax paid to the state. Thus this measure violated
the establishment clause of the US Constitution and several provisions of
the New Mexico Constitution. As an expenditure of tax dollars it is
a violation of Article IV, Section 31 of the New Mexico Constitution,
which prohibits a direct educational appropriation to any person,
corporation, association, institution or community not under the direct
control of the state. Additionally, the measure also violates
Article XII, Section 3 of the New Mexico Constitution because it
prohibits the use of public money for the support "of any sectarian,
denominational or private school…" This dangerous and unconstitutional measure received a do-pass recommendation from the Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee. Here is the Vote:
Follow this link to Send an Email to Ask Your Senator to Oppose Senate Bills 238. Links to Help You Craft Your Message and Send Emails to Legislators
Find and Contact Your Legislator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
