About usContactCalendarEventsPhoto GalleryLinks BACK TO LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY

Join Us

Issues:

Legislative Advocacy

Collective Bargaining

Employee Rights

Information:

Local Leader Resources

Professional Issues

ESP Resources

Events:

Read Across America

Upcoming Trainings

Pressroom:

Advocate's Voice

Press Releases

Award Winners

In Memoriam

Membership:

Retired

Student

Higher Ed

2011 Legislative Summary

Legislature Ends

The legislature ended Saturday with both houses nearly coming to a halt as various members talked the clock down.  In the Senate, Senators Ryan and Adair filibustered and prevented the passage of the capital outlay bill in an apparent attempt to force floor leader Michael Sanchez to hear House Bill 21, the Governor's bill to force schools to retain 3rd graders who were not at reading proficiency.  The extortion attempt didn't work and the Senate spent its last two hours listening to inane chatter. Neither the retention bill nor the capital outlay bill made it to a vote.

On the House side of the Capitol a prolonged debate between Representatives Thomas Garcia and Patty Lundstrom used up a great deal of the morning and kept many bills from being heard, including the Governor's proposed revamp of teacher evaluation, Senate Bill 502. Even though greatly amended, the measure still had many problematic features.  Governor Martinez has threatened to place some of her education reform plans on the agenda when the legislature is called to a special redistricting session later in the year, stay tuned.

Budget Bill Goes to Governor-Retirement Swap Included

The House voted late Wednesday to go along with minor Senate amendments to House Bill 2 bill and sent it to the governor on a party-line vote of 36-32, with all Republicans present opposing the measure.

The House gave final approval Thursday to Substitute for HBs 607 and 622, also part of the budget package. It caps the amount of rebates to film production companies at $50 million a year.   It could free up an estimated $18 million next year. The House sent that measure to the governor on a vote of 51-17.

On Thursday morning, a combination of progressive Democrats and Republicans in the House  rejected Senate changes to HB 628 aimed at freeing up another $110 million to help balance the budget by continuing the 1.5% retirement swap and adding another 1.75% swap on top of the earlier amount.  After Republican Governor Martinez indicated through a spokesperson that she wanted the retirement swap to be permanent, the House Democrats decided not to risk a conference committee that could have moved toward the permanent swap and moved to reconsider the concurrence vote.  They voted to reconsider and then to concur with the Senate amendments.  While we liked keeping this bill in limbo to prevent its ultimate passage, the chance that the swap could be made permanent was too big to take;  we supported the reconsideration even though the vote effectively passed the retirement swap.

 HB 628, was signed by the Governor, and once again budgets were balanced onthe backs of school employees.

The final budget package is made up of House Bill 2, the General Appropriations Act, House Taxation and Revenue Committee Substitute for HBs 607 and 622, and  HB 628.  Since all these measures passed with less than 72 hours to go in the session, the Governor will have until April 8 to make final decisions on signing or vetoing them.

The budget as finally passed adds $25 million that was not in the original  House Appropriations and Finance Committee (HAFC) proposal, most from the film credits bill.  Of this $25,  $7.5 million was added to school  public school support  the rest of the $25 million freed from the film credit compromise goes  to Medicaid, corrections, various other social services, and public safety.  The Senate added language to the bill that makes this additional funding contingent on passage of legislation like HB 607, the film credit reduction compromise.   Before the cut from the retirement swap, public school support is cut by about 1.5%, while the rest of state government's cut is nearer 3%.   The final version of the budget cuts the equivalent of $15 million from the State Equalization Guarantee and then created another $5 million dollar cut on top of that to allow the Secretary of Education to impose "efficiencies."  

One of the  two other pieces of the pieces that makes up this year's budget, House Taxation and Revenue Committee Substitute for HBs 607 and 622  was amended in the passed the Senate Finance Committee to change the cap of film credits from $45 million to $50 million, but to remove the ability to carry over credits from year to year, a major part of the compromise reached in the  House after much, often acrimonious, debate.  This legislation now only adds about $18 million new dollars to revenues; however, Finance Committee Chair John Arthur Smith stated that the other $7 million could be "easily" found.

The other piece of the budget puzzle is HB 628, forcing public employees to pay a larger share of retirement withholdings (see below)  to save the state budget some $47 million dollars on top of the 1.5% retirement swap passed two years ago.

HB 628, extends the 1.5% another year, but doesn't make it permanent.   HB 628 also passed the Senate early this morning.  It creates a shell game of  $27 million in pension swaps for school employees (and $22 million for other public employees) as proposed by the Legislative Finance Committee to increase employees' share of retirement by 1.75%.  The legislature pretends that the School Equalization Guarantee has this money in it, then, in another section of the budget reduces school appropriations by an amount equal to that saved by the passage of this bill, thus passing the increase passed on to employees.   Without enabling legislation, this this reduction won't happen. HAFC  Substitute for HB 628 is the enabling legislation.

The bill also extends the two-year 1.5 percent contribution shift implemented for FY10 and FY11 from the employer to the employee for those employees making more than $20,000 another two years (FY12 and FY13). 

It also makes a one-year contribution shift of 1.75 percent from the employer rate to the employee rate for those making more than $20,000 for FY12.  This changes the percentage of retirement withholdings for members of ERA and their employers (as well as employees covered by the Public employees Retirement Association).  This legislation "swaps" an additional 1.75% of salary with the state to reduce their share of retirement withholdings and increase yours.  This swap is all about budget balancing and does nothing to increase the solvency of the Educational Retirement Fund.  In fact, we think it harms the fund.  Employee dollars always add less stability to retirement than employer funds, since employees who choose not to retire can remove those dollars from the fund.

HB 628 was amended in the  Senate Finance Committee on Saturday.  One amendment requires an actuarial study by September 30, 2013, to analyze whether the higher employee contribution rates and lower employer contribution rates required statute have had or will have an adverse actuarial effect on the retirement system in violation of Article 20, Section 22 of the constitution of New Mexico (one of the contentions in our and other public employees' s law suit against the increases filed two years ago).  If there is an adverse effect, the two retirement boards will ask, but not necessarily get, a supplemental appropriation from the second session of the fifty-first legislature in the amount that will rectify the adverse actuarial effect.  It also has an amendment that extends both swaps from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013,  if the general fund increases by less than $100 million and the state fund reserves drop below 5%.

Teacher Evaluation Bill Greatly Amended in the House Labor Committee, Fails to Reach House Floor

Senate Bill 502 never made to a hearing on the House Floor as the clock wound down at noon Saturday.  It would have revamped New Mexico's teacher evaluation.   Senate Bill 502 is Sponsored by  Senator Cynthia Nava. .  One good point of the bill is it's requirement that evaluation systems be used to make employment decisions; this would add protections to prevent teacher terminations for reasons other than job related ones.  This bill has been introduced on behalf of the Governor and Secretary of Education.  They have been open to compromise and we have worked to make changes to the proposed legislation that protect teacher due process and that guarantee both NEA-NM and AFT NM places on the task force that will development the details of the new evaluation system.  Part of this development will be how to define "student growth" as shown by the New Mexico standards-based assessment.  We certainly don't accept that a straight test score, without any consideration of extenuating circumstances such as attendance and other negative factors, can be used.

The House Labor Committee on Thursday make several positive amendments to the bill, including delaying its real effect for a full one and one half years.  They also refined what is meant by student growth; the amendments require that a complete value-added system of measurement be in place before student growth can be used to evaluate teachers.   Other amendments removed many references to termination of teachers who fail to meet effectiveness standards.

Difference Versions of Governor's  School Grading Bill Pass Both Houses

We supported amendments that were added to the Senate (SB 427)  and House (HB Bill 335) versions of The House version of the Governor's school grading bill, , A-B-C-D-F SCHOOLS RATING SYSTEM, sponsored for the Governor by Representative Dennis Roch and Senator Vernon Asbill SB 427 passed the House and was signed by the Governor.

Funding Summary and Call for a Special Legislative Session

As a result of cuts implemented in the 2010-2011 funding year, state funding of the School Equalization Guarantee is now $106 million less than 2008, $213 million lower than the original appropriation for 2008-2009, and $141 million less than the solvency adjusted appropriation for 2008-2009! Add to that number the fact that a 2008 legislative authorized and funded study had determined that our schools were under funded by 15% - or roughly $354million in that year’s real dollars.


Law makers refused to move any revenue increases for public schools out of committee to the full body in either the House of Senate. The Senate refused to move Senate Joint Resolution 10, which would have maintained public education funding from the land grant permanent fund past its scheduled sunset and have added funding for early childhood programs. The House defeated House Joint Resolution 1, which would have simply maintained the status quo on school funding from the permanent fund. Not only were rich out-of-state corporations spared paying their fair share, so were New Mexico’s own millionaires. A Governor, who during the political campaign promised no funding cuts to public education, changed her tune at the beginning of the legislative session and promised to keep cuts away from the classroom. By the time she signed the passionless general appropriation act, she (and the legislature) placed the classroom, students, and teachers squarely in the bull’s eye of targeted cuts. School employees had been the victims of another budget balancing swap of retirement contributions, reducing salaries by another 1.75% and classroom spending had been cut another 1.5% on top of the cuts described above.


After the session, things went from bad to worse when State Education Secretary-designate Hanna Skandera announced that New Mexico's K-12 system has 7,900 new funding units. There is no reason to point fingers about why these new units weren’t apparent during the legislative session. There is also no reason to pretend they don’t really exist and can be audited away. They represent real funding needs in our public schools. They represent growth that should have been accounted for by the Governor and Legislature. New Mexico has a public school budget already deeply cut; increasing the number of units means each unit is worth less and responsible budget building becomes next to impossible in our public school districts.


In an Albuquerque Journal Editorial on April 11, the writer stated, “In 2008 Rep. Mimi Stewart, D-Albuquerque, helped craft a bill to simplify the funding formula and curb any abuse of special education dollars. The reform failed, mainly because the funding had a $354-million price tag.” Although they were really calling for more accountability in counting special education units, they acknowledged, albeit sideways, that Representative Stewart’s reform efforts failed, not because they were wrong, but, rather, because of the price tag. While keeping up their performance mantra, the Journal acknowledged the funding problems by stating, “New Mexico's education system is in a funding and performance mess.” The performance issue is complex ; recent studies have indicated that a child’s mother’s education level may be the single most salient factor in student performance! So, on the student achievement front, we better not think we have all or even very many of the answers.


When it comes to the “funding mess” issue, we know both the cause and the solution. The cause is policy makers who work “with their mouths” for maintaining classroom support, but fail to have any passion in setting priorities for producing revenues and funding public education. The solution is a change of heart in those policy makers or new policy makers. Elections have consequences; November 2010 had dire consequences for public school employees and the children we serve. It’s time those consequences extended to those “sunshine soldiers” of November who lose their memories in the cold winter of January legislative sessions. They and the Governor have a chance to correct those mistakes. It is becoming clear that the depths of the cuts and the harm they will do were not clear as the legislature drew to a close.


We need more funding, not rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic; the only way to increase funding is to call a special session of the legislature and ask both lawmakers and the Governor to have a change of heart and make our state’s children and their public schools a real priority. We ask Governor Martinez to remember her promise to protect classrooms from budget cuts and call that special session before school year 2011-2012 is irreconcilability compromised. Governor Martinez and the Legislature can have a second chance, but our state’s students don’t get a “do-over” for an indifferently funded school year.
 

 

v

 2011 Session  Update Archive

Contact Policy Makers

Some Useful Links to 2011 Legislative Information

New Mexico Legislature Home Page

Legislature's Live Streaming of Floor and Committee Sessions

New Mexico Legislature's Bill Locator

House and Senate Committees

Legislative Education Study Committee Staff Summaries of Legislation

Legislative Education Study Committee Staff Bill Analysis

Most Recent Committee Agendas and Floor Calendars

 

 

 

Copy right 2007